From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 15 16:20:04 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1DF016A422
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:20:04 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 504AF43D46
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:20:00 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (qmail 4558 invoked by uid 399); 15 Feb 2006 16:19:59 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1)
	by localhost with SMTP; 15 Feb 2006 16:19:59 -0000
Message-ID: <43F354AD.8030403@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:19:57 -0800
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060112)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>
References: <20060214112901.A74586@xorpc.icir.org>
	<43F2884E.1070006@FreeBSD.org>
	<20060214230933.B81035@xorpc.icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060214230933.B81035@xorpc.icir.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: please check your ports, pre-install vs pre-su-install
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:20:04 -0000

Luigi Rizzo wrote:

> or that you consider the two targets redundant and just default
> to one (pre-install with additional credential switch) should be enough ?

Yes. I think ports should handle this transparently, without the port author
having to do multiple target gymnastics.

Sorry I wasn't clear,

Doug

-- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection