From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 04:52:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E24310656CB; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 04:52:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu) Received: from hergotha.csail.mit.edu (hergotha.csail.mit.edu [66.92.79.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17A88FC16; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 04:52:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu) Received: from hergotha.csail.mit.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hergotha.csail.mit.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n114WZ4R080489; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 23:32:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by hergotha.csail.mit.edu (8.14.2/8.13.8/Submit) id n114WY3C080488; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 23:32:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 23:32:34 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200902010432.n114WY3C080488@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> To: obrien@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20090201025131.GC83330@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <20090113044111.134EC1CC0B@ptavv.es.net> <20090113222023.GA51810@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <496D1ED6.4090202@FreeBSD.org> <496DD37E.5010900@gmx.de> <58DAD35B6CCC476E89B9D02F51041E87@PegaPegII> Organization: None X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (hergotha.csail.mit.edu [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 31 Jan 2009 23:32:35 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=disabled version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on hergotha.csail.mit.edu X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 04:56:37 +0000 Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 04:52:05 -0000 David O'Brien writes: >Given there isn't a new C standard being worked on post C99 (only >addendums) That's news to me, and apparently news to WG14 as well. (See WG14 N1250.) -GAWollman