From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Jul 15  1:25:47 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666B037B79B
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 01:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from itojun@itojun.org)
Received: from kiwi.itojun.org (localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1])
	by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id RAA08555;
	Sat, 15 Jul 2000 17:25:38 +0900 (JST)
To: Mark Huizer <freebsd@dohd.cx>
Cc: current@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: freebsd's message of Fri, 14 Jul 2000 18:50:44 +0200.
      <20000714185044.A46560@dohd.cx>
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD  90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
Subject: Re: -current, racoon, ipsec
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 17:25:38 +0900
Message-ID: <8553.963649538@coconut.itojun.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


>Grr... ok, that might be solved when putting IPSEC in the kernel config,
>but the second part still stands, I guess. (Why include libipsec code
>when it is in the base tree... they should be compatible)

	they are NOT compatible.  security/racoon really needs to compile
	libipsec by itself.

itojun


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message