Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 07:24:48 -0500 From: <scratch65535@att.net> To: freebsd-ports <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?! Message-ID: <lnbr9cdn91jr8vtkecdv6enkafanjh8adg@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <20170209162600.GP13006@home.opsec.eu> References: <dvvl9chf9h22dpjto35d44enid819p9rnc@4ax.com> <h91m9cpbmp6js1km1bson74he5uuui9r6h@4ax.com> <1c6cccac-b151-d13c-c763-b336c4680118@freebsd.org> <ndjm9cl4samqgioi25ro8p2q6liimvr1h4@4ax.com> <35a953e3-918b-fc32-d990-51f7da16c884@FreeBSD.org> <AE0D514C-D235-462D-B31D-66FC619D9F4D@lastsummer.de> <20170209161249.GL2092@kib.kiev.ua> <20170209162600.GP13006@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 17:26:00 +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote >Getting the ports/pkg tree moving with the velocity necessary >to cope with the fast-changing world, sometimes things break >and we all try to prevent this. Sometimes, mistakes happen... But it's the velocity that's the problem, Kurt. Do you know of anyone who has successfully defended, or even tried to defend, the current manic pace of revision and obsoleting? I haven't, but I'd like to read it if you know of an attempted defence!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?lnbr9cdn91jr8vtkecdv6enkafanjh8adg>