From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 15:00:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B3916A4D0 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 15:00:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (alpha.siliconlandmark.com [209.69.98.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8085743D31 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 15:00:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (andy@localhost [127.0.0.1]) iBFF0N7M067261; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:00:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from localhost (andy@localhost)iBFF0JYA067258; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:00:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) X-Authentication-Warning: alpha.siliconlandmark.com: andy owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:00:19 -0500 (EST) From: Andre Guibert de Bruet To: Poul-Henning Kamp In-Reply-To: <44115.1103109518@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: <20041215095337.T19917@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> References: <44115.1103109518@critter.freebsd.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean cc: Matthias Andree cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Networked single-user recovery (Was: Re: Background fsck is broken) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 15:00:31 -0000 On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message , Matthias Andree writes: > >> On my wishlist, I've always wanted a "networked single user mode" >> (i. e. only sshd running, only root login with key possible), and I've >> always wondered why the whole system recovery is focused so much on the >> principle of a "single-user console". > > Implement it! I've wanted that for a long time too. You realize that you're advocating a statically linked sshd in /rescue, right? :-) I've always wanted a network recovery mode, and am currently looking into implementing such a beast (For racks devoid of serial console muxers and annoying jungles of kvm wires, for example). Andy | Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant > | Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/ >