From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 10 18:56:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6224916A4CE for ; Tue, 10 May 2005 18:56:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from godzilla.vipstructures.com (godzilla.vipstructures.com [66.195.71.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB1143DA9 for ; Tue, 10 May 2005 18:56:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from etoll@vipstructures.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.vipstructures.com [127.0.0.1]) by godzilla.vipstructures.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C7D28426 for ; Tue, 10 May 2005 14:56:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mothra.vipstructures.com (mothra.vipstructures.com [192.168.1.3]) by godzilla.vipstructures.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D482028423 for ; Tue, 10 May 2005 14:56:53 -0400 (EDT) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 14:56:52 -0400 Message-ID: <9BC86C67C3AF7646B9C5382020457A9456E910@VIP10-WIN2K> From: "Toll, Eric" To: "Marc Olzheim" X-Antivirus: checked by Norton Anti Virus X-MTA-Mailer: Postfix 2 by Wietse Venema - http://www.postfix.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on godzilla.vipstructures.com cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Glitch X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 18:56:55 -0000 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc Olzheim [mailto:marcolz@stack.nl]=20 > Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 2:45 PM > To: Toll, Eric > Cc: Marc Olzheim; freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Glitch >=20 > On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 02:40:31PM -0400, Toll, Eric wrote: > > Thanks again for your help. I now have the following (Both=20 > CPU's and=20 > > AGP!) Cool. > >=20 > > I'm not overly concerned with the following chunk: > >=20 > > "unknown: I/O range not supported > > unknown: I/O range not supported > > ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed=20 > > [\\_SB_.PCI0.LPC_.LPT_._CRS] (Node 0xffffff000080c440),=20 > AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT > > ACPI-0239: *** Error: Method execution failed=20 > > [\\_SB_.PCI0.LPC_.LPT_._CRS] (Node 0xffffff000080c440),=20 > > AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT can't fetch resources for=20 > \\_SB_.PCI0.LPC_.LPT_ - AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT" > >=20 > > As everything seems to work fine: Disk, network processors,=20 > and video. > > Should I be concerned with this? >=20 > No I have the same warnings on some of my machines, probably=20 > a flakey ACPI implentation in the BIOS, but if everything=20 > works, I wouldn't be bothered about it. The machines I=20 > maintain that have it are very stable... (maybe because none=20 > of the use lpc0 or a printer anyhow.) >=20 > Marc >=20 I thought LPT was printer, but wasn't sure. I axed (deleted) out many = things I didn't need in MYKERNEL, like all the SCSI stuff, the PCMCIA, the = wireless Etc. Took another look and Parallel or IEEE 1284 device doesn't seem to be in = there. So I cannot remove it. =20 Should I have cvsuped my 5.4 install making new kernel? =20 The FreeBSD cvsup boxen are very busy today in the US (Try again later) Anyway. Thanks again Marc. Kind Regards, Eric