From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Mar 26 11:22:35 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA22503 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 26 Mar 1995 11:22:35 -0800 Received: from grunt.grondar.za (grunt.grondar.za [196.7.18.129]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA22452; Sun, 26 Mar 1995 11:22:27 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grunt.grondar.za (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA12963; Sun, 26 Mar 1995 21:21:44 +0200 Message-Id: <199503261921.VAA12963@grunt.grondar.za> X-Authentication-Warning: grunt.grondar.za: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: Gary Palmer cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , "Jonathan M. Bresler" , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: 2.1 ports testing (was Re: expect & majordomo requests (fwd)) Date: Sun, 26 Mar 1995 21:21:43 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I dunno if we can formulate a (workable) system for alpha'ing ports, but > the tree should be tagged & branched at least... > > Anyone have any ideas how we could test the majority of ports on the branch > without someone (i.e. one person) going through the tree one port at a time? How about asking the "owners" to test their code on a particular day (or close) and datestamp that? OK, I know some folks have a lot of ports, and some don't do much maintaining, but those who do their bit can take off the load. M -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200