From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Dec 15 10:15:55 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA00753
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 10:15:55 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: (from jmb@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA00515;
          Tue, 15 Dec 1998 10:15:15 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jmb)
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 10:15:15 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199812151815.KAA00515@hub.freebsd.org>
From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: johan@granlund.nu
CC: phk@critter.freebsd.dk, julian@whistle.com, lars@akerlings.t.se,
        current@FreeBSD.ORG, isdn@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9812151823070.11916-100000@phoenix.granlund.nu>
	(message from Johan Granlund on Tue, 15 Dec 1998 18:49:13 +0100 (CET))
Subject: Re: if_sppp is BROKEN!!!
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9812151823070.11916-100000@phoenix.granlund.nu>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 18:49:13 +0100 (CET)
> From: Johan Granlund <johan@granlund.nu>
> 
> Lets get something clear. I was not talking about migrating our networking
> to SYSV style streams. 
[snip]
>                  If the endpoint is a serial port, network interface
> or the network protocol stack (for tunneling) should't be a issue if
> it's used right.
[snip]

	i agree.....with your first statement.  how that mess^Hhes
	with the second statement, i dont know.

jmb

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message