From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar  9 13:37:54 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDEB816A420;
	Thu,  9 Mar 2006 13:37:54 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr)
Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37C843D6E;
	Thu,  9 Mar 2006 13:37:53 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr)
Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])
	(authenticated bits=128)
	by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k29DbPOk032417
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
	Thu, 9 Mar 2006 15:37:29 +0200
Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1])
	by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k29DbG6a001901;
	Thu, 9 Mar 2006 15:37:17 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr)
Received: (from keramida@localhost)
	by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k29DbGlZ001900;
	Thu, 9 Mar 2006 15:37:16 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr)
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 15:37:16 +0200
From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>
To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20060309133716.GA1877@flame.pc>
References: <20060309092303.W10582@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
	<20060308085714.L10582@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
	<86bqwh59gn.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060308152413.GA43764@flame.pc>
	<20060308.115539.98861830.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<20060308192657.GA54826@ip.net.ua>
	<20060308200214.GA63755@flame.pc>
	<20060309081544.GD54826@ip.net.ua> <20060309125632.GA1677@flame.pc>
	<20060309132839.GA46241@ip.net.ua>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060309132839.GA46241@ip.net.ua>
X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.477,
	required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.92,
	BAYES_00 -2.60)
X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr
Cc: deischen@freebsd.org, des@des.no, Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org>,
	current@freebsd.org, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Subject: Re: When will bsnmp stop breaking -current builds
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 13:37:55 -0000

On 2006-03-09 15:28, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 02:56:33PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>> Do you think we also need to merge this to RELENG_6 and RELENG_5 some
>> time later, to allow upgrades from those branches to the HEAD of
>> CURRENT?
>
> No, such upgrades use HEAD sources, including fixed Makefile.inc1.

Ah, yes of course.  I didn't think of that :)

> Unless a similar problem existed in RELENG_[56] of course...

No, no problem in RELENG_x branches.

Thanks for the help once again, Ruslan :)