From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 15 18:46:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C073246; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:46:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asmrookie@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com (mail-la0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355528FC0C; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:46:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id j13so1864840lah.13 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:46:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=QmVBcnp7QxKg2G52n36uYrO8ekdeaKsqqSKFap8YT9A=; b=v5+Wt9pKENbAid7zWt5/WTbXVyXEMc/vcjzzOQ9x70RoYnM+QVOiIrKm4OcOhm+U79 HBg2t2n4zs5hokeeq/e6CsWnMe5AHF3azfbnieOhWBdOUoPZNaBEw6J+M/qk+J4R1Bg7 HVDU101Dtz1+PWFLSdeoZ8UwJKoskRmwj/tabAIS2BRoHHYj84acp1p1SlDyyN+2W04P ECuw31rjfep60wjPS/gF53MAQBlIoAqhGd7HZmHOw8ZwvWklgKC2biI23o9adHQO7uhu T/XgnZ6gtVaE+E7A5c+RdJ04uH+y/RZZSQBfqtNHht4fxAdJrBso+C4tGX1pUMQl94kE t+Hw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.104.50 with SMTP id gb18mr2032232lab.9.1353005215940; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:46:55 -0800 (PST) Sender: asmrookie@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.134.5 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:46:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50A4E8C0.5030608@FreeBSD.org> References: <50A4E8C0.5030608@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:46:55 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: t93cp-UE9SzJgNev7ybwPsBfpUg Message-ID: Subject: Re: LK_SHARED/LK_DOWNGRADE adjustments to lock.9 manual page From: Attilio Rao To: Andriy Gapon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: attilio@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:46:58 -0000 On 11/15/12, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > To people knowing the code, > > do the following documentation changes look correct? The latter chunk is not correct. It will panic only if assertions are on. I was thinking that however it would be good idea to patch lockmgr to panic also in non-debugging kernel situation. Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein