From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Mar 26 14:36:03 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA05304
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 14:36:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from etinc.com (et-gw-fr1.etinc.com [204.141.244.98])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA05250
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 14:35:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ntws (ntws.etinc.com [204.141.95.142]) by etinc.com (8.8.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA00821; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 17:38:57 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970326173451.00b61420@etinc.com>
X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 17:34:54 -0500
To: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au>
From: dennis <dennis@etinc.com>
Subject: Re: 2.2.1-RELEASE
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

At 09:48 AM 3/27/97 +1100, Daniel O'Callaghan wrote:
>
>
>On Wed, 26 Mar 1997, dennis wrote:
>
>> You guys ever think of doing a patch release (like a single tarball with 
>> the changes) for those of us that spent 2 days setting up 2.2R? 
>
>Yes, I have.  To upgrade to 2.2.1, I'll be fetching bin/*, unpacking, rm 
>-rf etc dev, repack, then untar with --unlink and -p.


Are the only changes in bin? What about the source to the kernel modules?
dont you need ssys also?