Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:51:42 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: Alex Kozlov <spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Make process title - % complete Message-ID: <9bbcef730910190851m7e82bd1aqc0bc55106c8a5d37@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20091019144135.GA91918@ravenloft.kiev.ua> References: <20091019144135.GA91918@ravenloft.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/10/19 Alex Kozlov <spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua>: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 04:35:08PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: >> >> if nobody objects, I'll commit it :) >> > >> > I seem to recall that setproctitle() is quite expensive to call; perha= ps >> > it would make sense offer a flag to prevent make(1) from calling it? [= 1] >> > >> > Anyway, the feature looks nice! I'd like to have it... >> > >> > [1] I'm unsure how expensive it is compared to fork(1)-ing etc; I'd >> > =C2=A0 =C2=A0expect it's negligable but who knows... >> >> The loop it's called in is not processed bazillion times per second >> (though it *is* called surprisingly often; small, fast jobs can result >> in somewhere in the order of magnitude of 100 iterations per second on >> a fast CPU). As you said - I expect it's negligable compared to fork() >> and the work jobs themselves do. > How about add this statistic to make info handler? You mean SIGINFO?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9bbcef730910190851m7e82bd1aqc0bc55106c8a5d37>