From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 24 13:22:42 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D6016A418 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:22:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from buki@dev.null.cz) Received: from dev.null.cz (null-gts.ptp-v6.cz.net [IPv6:2001:af0::1:0:d]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1475113C4A8 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:22:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from buki@dev.null.cz) Received: from dev.null.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dev.null.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l7ODMZiY099539 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:22:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from buki@dev.null.cz) Received: (from buki@localhost) by dev.null.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id l7ODMZ8i099538 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:22:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from buki) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:22:35 +0200 From: Buki To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070824132235.GB378@dev.null.cz> References: <1571172802.401187519463481.JavaMail.root@leda.georgiadis.eu> <20070824124826.GZ378@dev.null.cz> <46CED91E.2060602@tomjudge.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TtVnplxfhbQQzL6S" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46CED91E.2060602@tomjudge.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Subject: Re: Loosing alias IPs X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:22:42 -0000 --TtVnplxfhbQQzL6S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 02:11:58PM +0100, Tom Judge wrote: > Buki wrote: [snip] > > > >Also, aliased Ip addresses must be configured with netmask /32 > > >=20 > This is only true if the IP aliases are in the same network as the first= =20 > IP address. The following would be a valid configuration: >=20 > ifconfig_em0=3D"inet 192.168.0.1/24" > ifconfig_em0_alias0=3D"inet 192.168.0.2/32" > ifconfig_em0_alias1=3D"inet 192.168.1.1/24" > ifconfig_em0_alias2=3D"inet 192.168.1.2/32" yeah, after sending the mail I immediately thought of that scenario, but then again, from the original poster I got the idea the aliases were on the same network as the DHCP-assigned address > Tom Buki --=20 PGP public key: http://dev.null.cz/buki.asc /"\ \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML & Outlook Mail / \ http://www.thebackrow.net --TtVnplxfhbQQzL6S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGztubPzhIkpLLm08RAhfrAJ0RIjSYBoPOuQIFFtIhtQfbeqOGwwCgsdKL V6RpWRArpBRU4/6KO5aCEyA= =GyEk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TtVnplxfhbQQzL6S--