From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Dec  9 22:02:11 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7CF949
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun,  9 Dec 2012 22:02:11 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com)
Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com
 [69.62.255.118])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777738FC12
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun,  9 Dec 2012 22:02:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97AC5081A
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun,  9 Dec 2012 14:02:10 -0800 (PST)
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD for serious performance?
In-Reply-To: <20121209091305.238100@gmx.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 14:02:10 -0800
Message-ID: <20594.1355090530@tristatelogic.com>
From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 22:02:11 -0000


In message <20121209091305.238100@gmx.com>, 
"Dieter BSD" <dieterbsd@engineer.com> wrote:

>Ronald writes:
>> the last Alpha to be produced was shipped way back in 2004... eight years
>> ago... with a top speed of 1.3 GHz.  I now have a cheap little media player
>> thingy sitting on my desk, and _each_ of its two cores runs faster than that.
>> In short, Alphas hardly constitute high-end hardware in this day and age.
>
>So clock rate is the only thing that matters in your world?

Yea, pretty much.

As regards to reliability, except for the occasional low-level quirk (which
is usually taken care of for me by the kernel guys) I've never had a processor
fail on me.  Once, about five or six years ago I accidentally burnt up an
Athlon XP (by not having the heatsink properly seated) but that was entirely
my fault.

>I never found a way to boot from different partitions, much less
>different disks with GPT.

Having just been recently convinced to switch over to GPT (from MBR) I do
most sincerly hope that you are either joking or mistaken about this.

>The useless CHS baggage hangs around for decades, but useful
>hardware loses all support 5 nanoseconds after the last machine
>is sold. Other useful hardware waits years hoping to get support.

Yeabut on the bright side, you can't beat the price!


Regards,
rfg