From owner-freebsd-atm Fri Jan 19 18:32:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from workhorse.iMach.com (workhorse.iMach.com [206.127.77.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBC937B401 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 18:32:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (forrestc@localhost) by workhorse.iMach.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA11434 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 19:32:33 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 19:32:33 -0700 (MST) From: "Forrest W. Christian" To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Subject: Two OC3's, 100mb/s ethernet and BGP Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I am considering using FreeBSD as a router for connectivity to my two upstream providers. These will most likely be coming in on an ATM OC3 or similar. I was wondering if anyone on the list has real experience with running multiple ATM interfaces in a box, perhaps with BGP routing for an application like this. I would like to find out about what type of stability and throughput I can expect. (I am already convinced of the stability of FreeBSD. It just makes me nervous to use it as a core routing device for some irrational reason (maybe cisco brainwashing)) - Forrest W. Christian (forrestc@imach.com) AC7DE ---------------------------------------------------------------------- iMach, Ltd., P.O. Box 5749, Helena, MT 59604 http://www.imach.com Solutions for your high-tech problems. (406)-442-6648 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message