Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 11:17:51 +0100 From: Harold Gutch <logix@foobar.franken.de> To: "Robert A. Bruce" <rab@pike.cdrom.com> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The Linux PR firestorm disaster (w.r.t. FreeBSD) Message-ID: <19990301111751.A20739@foobar.franken.de> In-Reply-To: <199903010640.WAA28915@pike.cdrom.com>; from Robert A. Bruce on Sun, Feb 28, 1999 at 10:40:12PM -0800 References: <19990301040425.B19859@foobar.franken.de> <199903010640.WAA28915@pike.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 28, 1999 at 10:40:12PM -0800, Robert A. Bruce wrote: > >> 5. Linux has a lot more native commercial applications. > >> > >Which run faster under FreeBSD's Linux-emulation :). > > Which applications run faster on FreeBSD? How much faster? > Where is this published or how is it replicated? > *shrug* unfortunately this is merely based on somewhat personal experiance and reports of people I know, partially *BSD-users, partially Linux-users. I heard comments like "FreeBSD's scheduler is better, that's the reason for this", but I unfortunately have no publications or so to base my claims on. bye, Harold -- <Shabby> Sleep is an abstinence syndrome wich occurs due to lack of caffein. Wed Mar 4 04:53:33 CET 1998 #unix, ircnet To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990301111751.A20739>