From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 24 09:03:51 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE6516A468
	for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:03:51 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from tonix@interazioni.it)
Received: from mx02.interazioni.net (mx02.interazioni.net [80.94.114.204])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F58413C4B2
	for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:03:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from tonix@interazioni.it)
Received: (qmail 44068 invoked by uid 88); 24 Oct 2007 08:36:54 -0000
Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 44056, pid: 44063, t: 0.5750s
	scanners: attach: 1.1.0 clamav: 0.88.7/m:
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.56.199?)
	(tonix@interazioni.it@85.18.206.139)
	by relay.interazioni.net with ESMTPA; 24 Oct 2007 08:36:53 -0000
Message-ID: <471F0422.5080800@interazioni.it>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:36:50 +0200
From: "tonix (Antonio Nati)" <tonix@interazioni.it>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Advanced routing option
X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Services Providers <freebsd-isp.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp>,
	<mailto:freebsd-isp-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-isp>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-isp-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp>,
	<mailto:freebsd-isp-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:03:52 -0000

I'm using FreeBSD and Monowall in the most of my servers.

One limit I'm facing on both is the lack of an advanced routing feature.

Would be too complicated to modify "route" sources (and probably kernel 
tables) implementing a FROM parameter in ADD command?

route add 0.0.0.0/0   210.10.10.1
route add FROM 200.1.1.0/24      0.0.0.0/0     210.10.10.10
route add FROM 200.1.2.0/24      0.0.0.0/0     210.10.11.11

A FROM option would improve a lot routing capabilities and handling of 
multiple WAN connections.

Any comment?

Tonino

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
        Inter@zioni            Interazioni di Antonio Nati 
   http://www.interazioni.it      tonix@interazioni.it           
------------------------------------------------------------