From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 5 19:22:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B19F595B for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 19:22:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a0i55.smtpcorp.com (a0i55.smtpcorp.com [64.131.95.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84E2D1535 for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 19:22:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=smtpcorp.com; s=a0_1; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To:From; bh=S7EzT7EKWUSxVvlIRiY9h/Jj4ax8Y9JSNhXdVey6ONE=; b=CzA89a81GxFp9XTTeHXmt9et8nDcVjitHGBqlMx6ksGSV0pTNT/IqNE1UgNoeapspHJUVTSTpfWp90nAmQWEaF/5ZhioCrkL6N80OA8QhJ+42wx/wQmgQjAmd9MY20X3j6AYONls9KHX9P9zk99Om3/MeZxwgAVtU5J0AKqcoZc=; From: Daniel Corbe To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BETA4: fortune -o gone? References: <20131205010722.GE44739@glenbarber.us> <020c58348f43c35da047761d0be6a9f4.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <20131205152006.27766c1f@X220.ovitrap.com> <20131205.083242.74676021.sthaug@nethelp.no> Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 22:15:46 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20131205.083242.74676021.sthaug@nethelp.no> (sthaug@nethelp.no's message of "Thu, 05 Dec 2013 08:32:42 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Smtpcorp-Track: 365403492.1.11375005 X-debug-m-data: member_id=10661 trim_headers=Received X-debug-m-user: D: 3807463 N:365403492 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 19:22:56 -0000 sthaug@nethelp.no writes: >> > Nobody likes a good BikeShed. But _really_? >> > Is FreeBSD going "PC" (Politically Correct)? >> > Looks like a sign of weakness. :( >> >> a sign? It is a weakness. FreeBSD did not force anybody to use fortune >> with the -o option. It was also possible to delete the 'offensive' >> files. > > I see absolutely no reason why fortune -o should be removed. I suggest > that it should be restored. > > Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no This thread is entirely too long for the subject matter of having removed a bunch of random files from the sunday comics section of the file system that were of little use to anyone outside of "EDGY == OFFENSIVE" crowd. Shine on, you crazy diamonds. And don't ever let "the man" keep you down.