From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org  Mon Jan  4 13:02:03 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB364A608B2
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon,  4 Jan 2016 13:02:03 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABCCE1423
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon,  4 Jan 2016 13:02:03 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u04D23oN049241
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 13:02:03 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 205852] Be nicer about multiple sqlalchemy ports
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:02:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Ports Framework
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: mi@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: portmgr@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-205852-13-AWv8M3AJaM@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-205852-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-205852-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:02:03 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D205852

--- Comment #5 from Mikhail Teterin <mi@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Antoine Brodin from comment #4)
> Something like this may work for both sqlalchemy and sqlalchemy08
> (but the package builders will keep using sqlalchemy):

Yes, that's an alternative -- for the particular case of sqlalchemy. But
something more comprehensive may be in order. So far we've been resolving s=
uch
cases with USES-foo, but it may not be warranted in all cases.

> There may be side effects of overwriting PKG_INFO

Globally? Yes. Certainly a full test-run would be needed...

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=