From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 15 06:38:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F83A1065671 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:38:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A398FC18 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:38:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BD1EE918; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:38:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:38:30 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: YpJ6z+cPmDdUoLiXn1yYYKkA0V+Q3YFZK8heX4zw05t/ 1208241510 Received: from empiric.lon.incunabulum.net (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27FCF190F1; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:38:30 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <48044D65.4040600@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:38:29 +0100 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080405) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Garon References: <000d01c89e45$9c5ece10$6e01a8c0@argon> In-Reply-To: <000d01c89e45$9c5ece10$6e01a8c0@argon> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IGMPv3 support X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:38:31 -0000 Martin Garon wrote: > I am looking for a FreeBSD release with IGMPv3 and was surprised to find > none. > > I know the KAME project added support for IGMPv3. Anyone knows why this was > not imported back into the current sources? I was wondering if it had > anything to do with reliability or rather with business mumbo-jumbo. > I am actively working on this right now. Please see the bms_netdev branch in p4 for progress. The code there must be considered pre-alpha, it's a development branch. At the moment I am constructing baseline regression tests to make sure that everything works according to spec. It's harder than it looks as there are a few places where the delta-based vs the SSM API can lead to inconsistency and the specs are not completely unambiguous. cheers BMS