From owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 17:53:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20BCE16A41C for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 17:53:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from johnjawed@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B659B43D1F for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 17:53:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from johnjawed@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so3348580wri for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 10:53:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=uhk3OOqef2BNAKpcCyKU3R6oSXp3JH8YuXVh6e5OwsK2H12EMk51k4VZE23Xw8ZJsIRpC+u9wkw4im19YuW14Jd87i13Y7z1wbBlF/RZKui/X9kIB9S3yfspcQUoOyC1mGmSwsUssnhZ4FvEdc3kqZEsGc7sVfL3KXIJfscMvno= Received: by 10.54.61.19 with SMTP id j19mr21086wra; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 10:53:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.132.10 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 10:53:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 10:53:47 -0700 From: John Jawed To: Rostislav Krasny , freebsd-www@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <429D872F.2070203@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <429D872F.2070203@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: [30-05-05] Layout update X-BeenThere: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: John Jawed List-Id: FreeBSD Project Webmasters List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 17:53:48 -0000 Thank you Rostislav, this was exactly the type of feedback I was looking=20 towards, I will check out those changes ASAP :-) As far as IE goes, I know the site will be a bit less refined (no rounded= =20 borders, or hover effects) but that's better than implementing rounded imag= e=20 borders (which would make the site supply extra bandwith for those extra=20 images) or implementing Javascript events (which may or may not work for al= l=20 users). Regards On 6/1/05, Rostislav Krasny wrote: >=20 > Hello John, >=20 > I've read your message on freebsd-www, seen your nice work and did some > changes those you might be interesting to look on. See the attached ZIP > file. >=20 > Notes about some of the changes: >=20 > 1. I commented a 'display:table' property of #right_navbar CSS section > because Opera doesn't work properly with it. You can see the difference > by comparing Opera-01-06-2005.png and Opera-30-05-2005.png >=20 > 2. I changed -moz-border-radius to \-moz-border-radius because of > following message on Usenet: >=20 > http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.infosystems.www.authoring.styles= heets/msg/e41627bb5de2878a >=20 > The 'border-radius' CSS3 property doesn't work on any browser that I > have (IE6SP1, Mozilla 1.7.8, Opera 8 build 7561) and > '.tab:hover,.tab:focus' have no effect on my IE. >=20 > I also made some code style changes, not because I insist on them but > because they made the HTML and CSS code to be easear to understand for > me. Sorry about increasing the diff. >=20 >=20 >