From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb  3 08:09:45 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158CA16A420;
	Fri,  3 Feb 2006 08:09:45 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de)
Received: from smtp-3.dlr.de (smtp-3.dlr.de [195.37.61.187])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB8443D5F;
	Fri,  3 Feb 2006 08:09:39 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de)
Received: from beagle.kn.op.dlr.de ([129.247.173.6]) by smtp-3.dlr.de over TLS
	secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); 
	Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:09:38 +0100
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:09:43 +0100 (CET)
From: Harti Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de>
X-X-Sender: brandt_h@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de
To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
In-Reply-To: <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no>
Message-ID: <20060203090804.Q59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
References: <20060201165326.6E44E7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca>
	<20060201180223.O52964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
	<43E0F41C.5020907@samsco.org> <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Feb 2006 08:09:38.0160 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[2D4A7700:01C62899]
Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org>
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 08:09:45 -0000

On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:

DS>Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> writes:
DS>> I've been trying to reproduce this on my local hardware, but I can't
DS>> trigger it.
DS>
DS>The ISP driver abuses the inline keyword.  As I told mjacob earlier,
DS>the extensive inlining not only breaks the build, but probably hurts
DS>performance as well.
DS>
DS>(what gcc is complaining about, specifically, is that expanding calls
DS>to inlined functions causes isp_target_notify() to grow by more than
DS>100%)

The interesting point is: why does it build on my real sparc (2-UII CPUs, 
512MByte memory), but not on the tinderbox. Is there something about the 
crosscompiler that is different?

harti