From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 29 20:51:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DA4106564A; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 20:51:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rpaulo@freebsd.org) Received: from karen.lavabit.com (karen.lavabit.com [72.249.41.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9578FC0A; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 20:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from e.earth.lavabit.com (e.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.14]) by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E5A11BAAA; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:51:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 10.0.10.3 (54.81.54.77.rev.vodafone.pt [77.54.81.54]) by lavabit.com with ESMTP id W6XZP8SFF2IA; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:51:28 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Rui Paulo In-Reply-To: <20100429152321.GF2391@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 21:51:25 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7CD86617-BE58-44EC-A562-76BBAC4CB851@freebsd.org> References: <201004291519.o3TFJB8A081505@svn.freebsd.org> <20100429152321.GF2391@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> To: Kostik Belousov X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r207370 - head/sys/net80211 X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 20:51:30 -0000 On 29 Apr 2010, at 16:23, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 03:19:11PM +0000, Rui Paulo wrote: >> Author: rpaulo >> Date: Thu Apr 29 15:19:11 2010 >> New Revision: 207370 >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/207370 >>=20 >> Log: >> Decrement rxa_pad due to the addition of rxa_private. > If the goal was to keep the size of the struct ieee80211_rx_ampdu > as it was before addition of rxa_private, then this commit > still did not achieved it on 32bit arches. No, not really. It's more like a reminder for when I MFC. In general = it's okay that this padding shrinks this structure, I believe. Regards, -- Rui Paulo