From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Sep 26 06:33:09 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id GAA04834 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 26 Sep 1997 06:33:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.116.240]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA04828 for ; Fri, 26 Sep 1997 06:33:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de (gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de [137.226.30.2]) by Campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (8.8.7/RBI-Z13) with ESMTP id PAA26105 for ; Fri, 26 Sep 1997 15:33:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from kuku@localhost) by gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de (8.8.5/8.6.9) id PAA06145 for freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com; Fri, 26 Sep 1997 15:40:09 +0200 (MEST) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 15:40:09 +0200 (MEST) From: Christoph Kukulies Message-Id: <199709261340.PAA06145@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: diskless 100 Mbit - IntelEtherexpress - Q Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Would it be possible with the present status of network drivers/netboot to build a diskless 100 MBit (Fast Ethernet) setup of workstations? Would the Intel Etherexpress card be appropriate HW? I see an empty socket on the board but it's unclear to me whether this is for an EPROM. -- Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de