Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1997 12:59:20 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.ru> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu>, Kevin Eliuk <kevin_eliuk@sunshine.net>, FreeBSD-Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, peter@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error installing pine-3.96 Message-ID: <E0wBnEe-0007CC-00@rover.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 31 Mar 1997 23:52:04 %2B0400." <Pine.BSF.3.96.970331235051.594A-100000@nagual.ru> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970331235051.594A-100000@nagual.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.3.96.970331235051.594A-100000@nagual.ru> =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= writes: : But as I remember Jordan talk about 2.2 compatibility only, not 2.1.7 : compatibility... What is real subject now? 2.2, 2.1 or both compatibility? You are correct. The issue that Jordan raised was with 2.2. However, since the original poster was using 2.1.7, and since there may be demand for 2.1.7 support, at least for somethings, it may make sense to back port this change to install. If I get more than 3 requests to do it from -stable users, I'll do it. That's the only remaining issue as far as I can tell. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0wBnEe-0007CC-00>