Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 22:40:03 +0100 From: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> To: Niclas Zeising <zeising@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r495284 - in head/devel: valgrind valgrind-devel Message-ID: <4l8a-csss-wny@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201903101129.x2ABTrCp050295@repo.freebsd.org> (Niclas Zeising's message of "Sun, 10 Mar 2019 11:29:53 %2B0000 (UTC)") References: <201903101129.x2ABTrCp050295@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Niclas Zeising <zeising@FreeBSD.org> writes: > Author: zeising > Date: Sun Mar 10 11:29:53 2019 > New Revision: 495284 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/495284 > > Log: > Grab valgrind ports > > Grab valgrind ports, I know people outside the project who are interested in > this. Grab it in the interim. > > If you are interested in helping out, please let me know! Are you planning to maintain it in the meantime? I'm asking because the rationale looks like maintainer squatting or favoritism. In the past we had a similar issue with placeholder maintainer of ports-mgmt/portmaster which confused users about the actual status. The general issue stemmed from some committers arguing against handing out handing out maintainership to people who've never submitted a patch (to the port in question). That got partially addressed by portmgr@ making a policy of revoking maintainership after 3 months of no feedback or 3 consecutive timeouts.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4l8a-csss-wny>