Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 05:55:03 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, "Mars G. Miro" <marsgmiro@gmail.com>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: linprocfs and linux_base port upgrade Message-ID: <20060222105503.GA86596@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060222111658.2589ilcqo40w8ccs@netchild.homeip.net> References: <28edec3c0602211753p7290e85q3fb23d799c0cf0fc@mail.gmail.com> <20060222015924.GA74781@xor.obsecurity.org> <28edec3c0602211901j63066e01te585c12a42057d1e@mail.gmail.com> <20060222030810.GA75798@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060222111658.2589ilcqo40w8ccs@netchild.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:16:58AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: >=20 > Regarding the question of the OP: changing "ro" to "ro,noauto" has a simi= lar > effect in the race-case. >=20 > >On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:01:57AM +0800, Mars G. Miro wrote: > > > >>> No, it's because it tried and failed to umount linprocfs. Presumably > >>> you didnt have linprocfs mounted in your jail, but some packages > >> > >>Well mounting/unmounting stuff inside the jail is a pain. I now recall > >>I had to mount linprocfs from the host to the jail, thus I was able to > >>build them. Hrm, perhaps its time for jail_<jailname>_linprocfs_enable > >>(as with devfs inside a jail) ... > > > >I think you're missing my point: if you don't have linprocfs mounted, > >ports like jdk will fail. If you do have it mounted, ports like > >linux_base will fail [because they need to umount it and remount it]. > > > >The latter should be fixed so that you can consistently set up a jail > >and have it work in both cases. >=20 > Perhaps (completely untested): > @exec mkdir -p %D/proc || true > @dirrmtry proc > @unexec [ ! -d %D/proc ] || echo "+++ Please unmount linprocfs and remove > %D/proc by hand!" > and not touching linprocfs at all. >=20 > Kris, would this work on pointyhat? I don't think so: I posted a log excerpt of what fails when linprocfs remains mounted (because the umount doesn't work somehow) during the install. cpio needs to be told somehow not to try and write into /proc. Kris --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD/EMHWry0BWjoQKURAqTCAJ9K+vOObFOqodrq3UqSK6HjZ0FuaACg/eil IRKn5+OO3wJqCEx5/2T48mE= =IQZU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060222105503.GA86596>