Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 09:57:42 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> To: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>, Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>, "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Again, flavors or options? Message-ID: <ea076db0-9455-5fc0-b1ba-3d94c8aeaee7@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5abfbdc3-acc2-1c73-44e8-f47b48fdcb1e@rawbw.com> References: <85f87eb1-ab21-e802-866c-93d7edbfb92a@rawbw.com> <8801756c-bc4f-3832-3468-d826b4884aeb@FreeBSD.org> <5abfbdc3-acc2-1c73-44e8-f47b48fdcb1e@rawbw.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 21/12/2017 =C3=A0 09:55, Yuri a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: > On 12/21/17 00:17, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >> Flavors is for when a port needs to be built differently multiple time= s. >> =C2=A0From what you are saying, this can be built once and splitted up= later, >> this is subpackages. For now, you should use options, with what most >> people need as the default options. You could do slave ports, but I >> don't see the point. > > > Is there an ETA for sub-packages? When it is done. --=20 Mathieu Arnold
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ea076db0-9455-5fc0-b1ba-3d94c8aeaee7>