Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 00:50:30 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: time_t not to change size on x86 Message-ID: <20011027005030.D94651@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200110270240.f9R2eGv07017@mass.dis.org>; from msmith@freebsd.org on Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 07:40:16PM -0700 References: <200110270240.f9R2eGv07017@mass.dis.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 07:40:16PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: > > Just to clarify, based on Peter's last mail. > > The proposal is not to change the size of time_t on x86, merely to > select a suitable size on new platforms so that we migrate in a > suitable fashion. What you describe is his *revamped* proposal. As one of the 3 in a private thread that started this, I speak with greater knowledge on what the proposal was. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011027005030.D94651>