Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 10:39:25 -0400 From: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> To: Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] __FreeBSD_kernel__ Message-ID: <20110703103925.0bdf255a@kan.dnsalias.net> In-Reply-To: <CAOfDtXN8NOLm47qg_ht3usQ_ZF==OSRxfTZaa4yGq1rqw-CXOw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAOfDtXPUxQO1zbnxh8sh%2By7g=d8QaH2svYtEQJ06L4d%2BQKG8VA@mail.gmail.com> <20110702193724.5c55a6c9@kan.dnsalias.net> <CAOfDtXN8NOLm47qg_ht3usQ_ZF==OSRxfTZaa4yGq1rqw-CXOw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 12:41:44 +0200 Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org> wrote: > 2011/7/3 Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com>: > > GCC is on the way to be > > pushed out into ports in FreeBSD and it will not the the only usable > > compiler before long. Your proposal will force similar changes in > > Clang, Path64 and PCC, <what else>, to be really universal which is > > not practical. > > Would my proposal be more welcome if it included a patch for Clang, > Path64 and PCC as well? > > -- > Robert Millan Not really, unless you have way of sticking this definition into past compiler releases. -- Alexander Kabaev [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFOEH8hQ6z1jMm+XZYRAnHZAJ46zd5q7IVaSX8yKYmQmbODFx1PqgCfRUQ/ /ARxhzRone2utHUlqzSbO9c= =S2uw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110703103925.0bdf255a>