From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Apr 2 16:40:53 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from detlev.UUCP (tex-88.camalott.com [208.229.74.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877B714E1A for ; Fri, 2 Apr 1999 16:40:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joelh@gnu.org) Received: (from joelh@localhost) by detlev.UUCP (8.9.3/8.9.1) id SAA47703; Fri, 2 Apr 1999 18:40:29 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from joelh) To: Ladavac Marino Cc: "'Chuck Robey'" , "Alton, Matthew" , DL-ADM , "'Hackers@FreeBSD.ORG'" Subject: Re: AIX going BSD References: <97A8CA5BF490D211A94F0000F6C2E55D097586@s-lmh-wi-900.corpnet.at> From: Joel Ray Holveck Date: 02 Apr 1999 18:40:29 -0600 In-Reply-To: Ladavac Marino's message of "Thu, 1 Apr 1999 10:54:03 +0200" Message-ID: <86zp4qo7sy.fsf@detlev.UUCP> Lines: 20 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >> AIX is *not* doing anything at all outside the usual, and it would, >> in fact, be remarkable (and outside the expected norm) if you >> *didn't* find some BSD code in it. Why don't you go look at, oh, >> Hewlett Packard, or some other mainstream vendor? > [ML] I'm afraid you are not getting it. > I was actually commending IBM/AIX on its good taste in choice of > source bits (i.e. ours and NetBSD's) and actually acknowledging that (by > not removing the RCS id lines). I've always been amused that AIX left the fortunes in the file that disparage IBM. Cheers, joelh -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message