From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Jun 15 16:44:34 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from technokratis.com (modemcable052.174-202-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.202.174.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 74F6037B401; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 16:44:31 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bmilekic@technokratis.com)
Received: (from bmilekic@localhost)
	by technokratis.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f5FNix801611;
	Fri, 15 Jun 2001 19:44:59 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from bmilekic)
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 19:44:59 -0400
From: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@technokratis.com>
To: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com>
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, terry@freebsd.org,
	rwatson@freebsd.org, jlemon@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: New Mbuf Allocator (some graphs)
Message-ID: <20010615194459.A1549@technokratis.com>
References: <20010615185421.A1179@technokratis.com> <20010615183255.C68883@prism.flugsvamp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010615183255.C68883@prism.flugsvamp.com>; from jlemon@flugsvamp.com on Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 06:32:55PM -0500
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 06:32:55PM -0500, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 06:54:21PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Folks,
> > 
> >   Here are some performance results. Keep in mind that we're still under
> > Giant.
> > 
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~bmilekic/code/mb_alloc/results.html
> 
> Just for comparision, 6-way results are at:
> 
>     http://www.flugsvamp.com/~jlemon/fbsd/netpipe/

	Are you sure those aren't inverted? (i.e. swap(present, mb_alloc)?)

	In any case, the mb_alloc code you used still has the malloc() and
free() calls during cluster allocation and freeing and still, it looks to
me as very comparable nonetheless. 
 
> -- 
> Jonathan
 

-- 
 Bosko Milekic
 bmilekic@technokratis.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message