From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Dec 16 17:54:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E34C437B401 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:54:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail3.sea.registeredsite.com (mail3.sea.registeredsite.com [66.111.73.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E67343ED1 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:54:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from admin@asarian-host.net) Received: from asarian-host.net (asarian-host.net [216.122.74.112]) by mail3.sea.registeredsite.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gBH1s8Mo030069 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 20:54:09 -0500 Comments: To protect the identity of the sender, certain header fields are either not shown, or masked. Anonymous email addresses for asarians can be requested by filling in the appropriate form at: https://asarian-host.net/cgi-bin/signup.cgi Received: (from root@localhost) by asarian-host.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) id gBH1s7844740 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 02:54:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from admin@asarian-host.net) Posted-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 02:54:07 +0100 (CET) From: Mark Message-Id: <200212170154.GBH1S5W44719@asarian-host.net> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 02:54:01 +0100 X-Authenticated-Sender: admin@asarian-host.net Subject: Re: Upload substantially slower than download X-Trace: weRIyKwBYtdes6DtSkHqQyQXsselTvW562I/jSWrQ7pmkUH13Krd3IDwS414JoSv X-Complaints-To: abuse@asarian-host.net X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we are unable to process your complaint Organization: Asarian-host To: Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" References: <200212170027.GBH0RUW29189@asarian-host.net> <1040085387.86677.105.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Auth: Asarian-host PGP signature iQEVAwUAPf6DvzFqW1BleBN9AQHcnQf9HxqJ3LGVAqoic2mlUHPoqt7BvK/A7uNs +EODwcKy6nubhxpQcbMQr6tLyLyQ4GqWvvsA+BJhlVA30qz2gTQFb/mi06zzUIWX tL6btcPA5yEW1DE9XzsMc+69d3DhI2MQAbZBtj3B7tUFacUYPgjM4vcOOAgmFnx5 EEtM7SitHJwB4m9AVDG7/ZMB+fZNt1WAysbOgcWL6hFQnT0p2nYpWpDGNuYfo28i a25TN72ptWg+n6jkbL2m0mfTwqLkIv2SzosjnBKaWR8UiqU8uYyJ3KInZ8cZv20l mgp+AURsOhqKq23aAIW1LR95JH/JEJNhnospc/qfeP6ONORtY0Fjdg== =/xpG Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stacey Roberts" To: "Mark" Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 1:36 AM Subject: Re: Upload substantially slower than download > Hi Mark, > How are you doing the d'loads to / from each machine? Hi Stacey, Thanks for your quick reaction. :) I used SecureFX, both for the upload and the download. I measures the download again, and it is ~2700K/s for a gzipped file. Upload is still around 32K/s. > What's between the two boxes involved in the tests? A DrayTek Vigor 2600 ADSL modem/router with standard CAT5 UTP cables between them. > What's the card configs on the WinXP box? The network card on the XP-machine looks like this: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : Description . . . . . . : Realtek RTL8139 Family PCI Fast Ethernet NIC Physical Address. . . : 00-50-FA-81-5B-AC Dhcp Enabled. . . . . : No IP Address. . . . . . . : 192.168.79.3 Subnet Mask . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . : I tested it setting both its speed to "Auto-detect", and any combination of half/full duplex (both 10/100). > You knew it was coming.., what's the interface config on the network > device on the lan? I set the LAN IP Network Configuration to use 192.168.79.1 as default gateway (subnet 255.255.255.0). NAT takes care of the "outside" address, but that does not seem to apply here. And I defined two boxes: my XP one (192.168.79.3), and my FreeBSD box (192.168.79.128). I just do not understand how upload can be so significantly slower. As far as I can see, I see no errors (as in a bad connection) that would not be about the same for both ways. Thanks again! - Mark To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message