From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Fri Jan 24 18:42:35 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819DF1F8544; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 18:42:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-f66.google.com (mail-io1-f66.google.com [209.85.166.66]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4847L23nTlz4NmX; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 18:42:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-f66.google.com with SMTP id i11so2956119ioi.12; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:42:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ix0JJQVPl6x/ShYq5zwvNGJGScfu/UHFw9/oADcqYNU=; b=sNlS2xF9qxK5tI2oynYzHiFI7Ofj6pC2CbwCwEQXiKM/frTFlPptkK8ZDRHctBX6tR Qd6SMuODXM6TeYPXm6Ej9jvLY8Cv1WZ50ykyBHJGCQCZQuRCCCgzgL6lH2/B/Gy19ahS LegfrXcMzEAQ7ZsNp7RX6+tx005TNDYQMx8IMY11xb1IvCvF4IkEC0W7dqCJ1ggpgynO NDannz/AxQ4DC9L26DcUHQ5VUO5XRJQE9NHbIAkaEH5OEVPsOrG0CezCmWhHDD1LrDZg 6PTOpeZPkj+Bh5bnMsYuOP1i4e7AigroL3y6wsGSISW11qdHJKcMwDcmM/BHoh/IARsb jpGA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUPZ1V/GZpvn4+grcs2xkeHbX1/+fUJyvcxMJyvNvUQGhtJ6WEK zuXzhTSvz86SujRxTVfpS1DsyUuLsVtRJDifLal+/A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqydYlDK0i+rlpBIztn8EMWaF+dql6rqkNZTYK9n/kNnMI1C/V2RMz4TXPCvGldH9ERc51l0l+/5fWaNG8ier1U= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:d617:: with SMTP id w23mr3191820iom.98.1579891352159; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:42:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Ed Maste Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 13:42:19 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Gcc 4.2.1 to be removed before FreeBSD 13, a firm timeline To: sparc64@freebsd.org Cc: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4847L23nTlz4NmX X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carpeddiem@gmail.com designates 209.85.166.66 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carpeddiem@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.05 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE(-1.05)[ip: (-0.32), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.06), asn: 15169(-1.80), country: US(-0.05)]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[66.166.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[66.166.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 18:42:35 -0000 On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 17:09, Ed Maste wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 at 15:19, Ed Maste wrote: > > > > PR 233405 libunwind > > I've somewhat addressed this today, committing (untested) build fixes > from cem@. Someone with an interest in sparc64 and access to hardware > will need to test and investigate any failures. Note that this was reverted on request. Someone with sparc64 hardware will need to reapply the patch from PR233405, test it, and report. Additional bug fixing will almost certainly be required. > > PR 239851 BSD crtbegin > > This is now the main blocking issue. This is still outstanding, with GCC-derived crt scheduled for removal at the end of the month. See https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23122 for more. > > PR 243119 binutils 2.33.1,1 assertion failure (but it has a patch!) > > A fixed binutils package should be available in a week or so. The fixed package is available (and the fix working its way to a new upstream release).