From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct  8 18:14:49 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7466B16A41A;
	Mon,  8 Oct 2007 18:14:49 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from cb@severious.net)
Received: from ion.gank.org (ion.gank.org [69.55.238.164])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6307713C457;
	Mon,  8 Oct 2007 18:14:49 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from cb@severious.net)
Received: by ion.gank.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 05316110F2; Mon,  8 Oct 2007 13:14:49 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 13:14:47 -0500
From: Craig Boston <cb@severious.net>
To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org,
	freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20071008181447.GD98555@nowhere>
Mail-Followup-To: Craig Boston <cb@severious.net>,
	Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org,
	freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
References: <20071005000046.GC92272@garage.freebsd.pl>
	<20071008121523.GM2327@garage.freebsd.pl>
	<20071008163349.GB98555@nowhere>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20071008163349.GB98555@nowhere>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: 
Subject: Re: ZFS kmem_map too small.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 18:14:49 -0000

On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:33:49AM -0500, Craig Boston wrote:
> Um, tsleep()ing when M_NOWAIT is set?  Yes, I'd call that quite a hack
> :)

Oops, my binary logic is inverted today.  Please ignore.

Craig