From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Aug 10 20:51:44 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883A8106572E;
	Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:51:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06EAF8FC1E;
	Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:51:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2])
	by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042242049;
	Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:51:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id D72E48449B; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:51:41 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To: Oleksandr Tymoshenko <gonzo@freebsd.org>
References: <20080729.161303.709402272.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<86r69buar0.fsf@ds4.des.no> <489B08F6.8060605@freebsd.org>
	<867iasfmrh.fsf@ds4.des.no> <489EDD2F.9080302@freebsd.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:51:41 +0200
In-Reply-To: <489EDD2F.9080302@freebsd.org> (Oleksandr Tymoshenko's message of
	"Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:21:03 +0300")
Message-ID: <86myjkbnky.fsf@ds4.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Need a code review
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:51:44 -0000

Oleksandr Tymoshenko <gonzo@freebsd.org> writes:
> Here is new fix: http://people.freebsd.org/~gonzo/mips2/libpam2.diff
> The idea is to set define explicitly for dynamic case rather then rely
> on __PIC__.

This is completely backwards.  Dynamic is the default option, and in
fact the only supported option on many (non-FreeBSD) systems.  If it
were up to me, I would remove support for statically linked modules
entirely.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no