Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:58:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> To: John Hay <jhay@icomtek.csir.co.za> Cc: dwbear75@gmail.com Subject: Re: openssh version Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040924115624.82478A-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <200201020559.g025xaX94943@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, John Hay wrote:
> Well I can accept your argument for -stable, although bigger changes has
> gone in -stable in the past, but what about -current? My -current boxes
> also still claim: "sshd version OpenSSH_2.9 FreeBSD localisations
> 20011202" And this is the problem, if we don't have -current upgraded
> we have little chance in getting wrinkles out and very little chance of
> it going in -stable.
>
> Also maybe we should think again about all our local changes and if all
> of them are really necesary. If we can ditch some, that will also make
> it a lot easier to upgrade.
Funny, my -CURRENT boxes claim:
SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_3.8.1p1 FreeBSD-20040419
I might check that you're using the version shipped with FreeBSD rather
than a package-installed version, and that your sshd configuration doesn't
include a line to indicate the older version number.
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
robert@fledge.watson.org Principal Research Scientist, McAfee Research
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040924115624.82478A-100000>