Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:40:33 +0100 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How are [MAINTAINER] patches handled and why aren't PRs FIFO? Message-ID: <BANLkTikbP_p%2BrCoV5hm125fn0WrjH6uzuw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinziPLD=bTbnD3RCmZBoA3N-7_WaA@mail.gmail.com> References: <4DB7B237.7000603@marino.st> <BANLkTinoGufNYZmkFgQmwGR4RjBXWXcDTA@mail.gmail.com> <20110427075436.70ae18ac@seibercom.net> <4DB96EC9.8000506@FreeBSD.org> <20110428190745.GE77343@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <BANLkTinziPLD=bTbnD3RCmZBoA3N-7_WaA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28 April 2011 20:23, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 28 Apr 2011 20:08, "Chip Camden" <sterling@camdensoftware.com> wrote: >> >> Correct me if I'm wrong, but as I understand it committers have commit >> privilege for all ports. =A0What if certain qualified port maintainers w= ho >> aren't committers were nevertheless given commit access for only the lea= f >> ports that they maintain? =A0Wouldn't that speed up the overall process? >> > > Search the archives for an answer or ten. > Sorry for the terse response, touchscreen phones are horrible to email on. I've found one of the conversations I was thinking of [1] -- these often come up. It should probably be on some kind of FAQ list... Chris [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-ports@freebsd.org/msg28399.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTikbP_p%2BrCoV5hm125fn0WrjH6uzuw>