From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 18:25:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2D337B401 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 18:25:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [207.200.153.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7792243FA3 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 18:25:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tom@sdf.com) Received: from tom (helo=localhost) by misery.sdf.com with local-esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 19HuGB-0001Tv-00; Mon, 19 May 2003 16:41:39 -0700 Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 16:41:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius To: "Joseph T. Klein" In-Reply-To: <523443F2-8A26-11D7-A0BC-003065BA9B36@titania.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Illegal use of my server?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 01:25:10 -0000 On Mon, 19 May 2003, Joseph T. Klein wrote: > The Squid package and port should have a *big* warning sign on them > about this. > I know of at least one network that was blacklisted due to the lack of > tight > ACLs on Squid. ... The Squid port should probably ship with a default-deny rule. As far I can see, every IP on the Internet is port scanned at least several times a day. If you have something that is wide-open, it will be found very quickly. Tom