From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 3 14:01:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11BE16A4CE for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:01:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from hanoi.cronyx.ru (hanoi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D3443D1D for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:01:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: (from root@localhost) by hanoi.cronyx.ru id i23Lx7Ae066982 for cvs-src@FreeBSD.org.checked; (8.12.8/vak/2.1) Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:59:07 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: from cronyx.ru (rik.cronyx.ru [172.22.4.1]) by hanoi.cronyx.ru with ESMTP id i23LufVJ066855; (8.12.8/vak/2.1) Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:56:41 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Message-ID: <404655DE.4060204@cronyx.ru> Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 01:02:06 +0300 From: Roman Kurakin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020610 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "M. Warner Losh" References: <4046058E.3090900@cronyx.ru> <20040304015305Q.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <20040303.102155.38697537.imp@bsdimp.com> <20040303.104935.73668905.imp@bsdimp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: rik@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org cc: nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4/man4.i386 ct.4 X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 22:01:07 -0000 Correct me if I am wrong. Renaming of one of the devices would solve naming problems but it would hit one group of users. I think there is a compromis 1. If we have PC98, man4.i386 wouldn't appear in such installation. So man ct wouldn't confuse scsi ct users. 2. If we have i386 installation and man for scsi ct would be added we just need something like man4.pc98 to put it there and it would be hidden in i386 arch for Cronyx/Tau users. Roman M. Warner Losh wrote: >P.S. I accept responsibility for creating this conflict. I thought it >would be OK. I also knew of the two ct drivers for a long time, but >didn't think it would be an issue given that they were in different >domains. > >Let's continue to work towards resolving the issue (and the bigger >issue it exposes). > >Warner > > > > >