From owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 18:10:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: python@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04EFE855; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 18:10:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x233.google.com (mail-yk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0E2994D; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 18:10:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f179.google.com with SMTP id 19so4615893ykq.10; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:10:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=NfsV5HWmmkI1qKq3s4xX3v/2BgUnKE630fmdgRFVOuo=; b=tOfQe9pJr08+WZypuJFS1y4V4Ac7oRQOleX3XLgjPO5SN200F6N0iToAx7IJHHBXdO uMlY7pMOkMtu/+aRYADYJXqrDpv6VuHb4ikWExwzmxrItBp0wxDPXVLTeHIG3FOyXnsk eiXt+ryNvtlOck/HtYXcYY2OMi42LoX/h65VThy3AH2qpVpk5bYQDQHckXQ8h9PTQ9Jf TNINScYnMdYeCnUCWXYagl9HD+SdzyjHRJh0v02gG61ye3y611HZkpJGCqao0sZpB67W zkWhjW5LyCOl8cRmTU4sFdYaOWAjAqw6oLGCJjDcL7pXJ/f5ktQvQpqvwIKvfGZW/aWt GWuQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.105.210 with SMTP id k58mr12202378yhg.52.1420827024620; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:10:24 -0800 (PST) Sender: antoine.brodin.freebsd@gmail.com Received: by 10.170.142.198 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 10:10:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54B0154B.80801@ignoranthack.me> References: <54AC74E0.4050404@ignoranthack.me> <20150107072132.GA1050@medusa.sysfault.org> <54AD5BB9.2060701@ignoranthack.me> <1420653060968-5979111.post@n5.nabble.com> <20150109183334.Horde.DDLUOEFT2TrMFUcP63h_9Q1@webmail.df.eu> <54B0154B.80801@ignoranthack.me> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 18:10:24 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1MCMAnqTyju4Ou4qYhJfVJbViYI Message-ID: Subject: Re: python waf bypasses _MAKE_JOBS number From: Antoine Brodin To: Sean Bruno Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "sson \[via FreeBSD\]" , Marcus von Appen , python@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 18:10:26 -0000 On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Sean Bruno wrote: > Marcus: > > The thing that I would like "fixed" is python waf ignoring the fact > that it should not try and detect the number of CPUs on the system. > Let me rephrase the problem, there are some problems in some individual ports using waf. Those ports do not respect ${MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER}, especially when MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=1. This breaks qemu which is not multi job friendly (people using qemu have DISABLE_MAKE_JOBS=yes which sets MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER to 1). Cheers, Antoine