From owner-freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Tue Jul 4 14:28:15 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7154D92FA5 for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 14:28:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpalmer@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C30D77CA2D for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 14:28:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpalmer@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C24CBD92FA4; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 14:28:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: gnome@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E07D92FA3 for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 14:28:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpalmer@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.in-addr.com (mail.in-addr.com [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:61e8::2525:2525]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D2547CA2B for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 14:28:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpalmer@freebsd.org) Received: from gjp by mail.in-addr.com with local (Exim 4.89 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1dSOoG-0009ye-HA; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 15:28:12 +0100 Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 15:28:12 +0100 From: Gary Palmer To: Omar S Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devel/glib20 port installation broken? Message-ID: <20170704142812.GA79512@in-addr.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gpalmer@freebsd.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.in-addr.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 14:28:15 -0000 On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 09:35:12PM -0400, Omar S wrote: > The most recent port revision for glib20 seems to be broken (installation). > Worked fine previously... On FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p9 (releng), vanilla > ports config, using portupgrade: > > ---> Installation of devel/glib20 started at: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 21:25:54 > -0400 > ---> Installing the new version via the port > ===> Installing for glib-2.50.2_3,1 > ===> glib-2.50.2_3,1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - found > ===> glib-2.50.2_3,1 depends on package: perl5>=5.24<5.25 - found > ===> glib-2.50.2_3,1 depends on shared library: libpcre.so - found > (/usr/local/lib/libpcre.so) > ===> glib-2.50.2_3,1 depends on shared library: libffi.so - found > (/usr/local/lib/libffi.so) > ===> glib-2.50.2_3,1 depends on shared library: libintl.so - found > (/usr/local/lib/libintl.so) > ===> glib-2.50.2_3,1 depends on shared library: libiconv.so - found > (/usr/local/lib/libiconv.so) > ===> Registering installation for glib-2.50.2_3,1 as automatic > pkg-static: Unable to access file > /usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/stage/usr/local/<<<<<<< .mine:No such file or > directory > pkg-static: Unable to access file > /usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/stage/usr/local/||||||| .r441467:No such file > or directory > pkg-static: Unable to access file > /usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/stage/usr/local/=======:No such file or > directory > pkg-static: duplicate file listing: > /usr/local/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.5000.2-gdb.py, > ignoring > pkg-static: duplicate file listing: > /usr/local/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/local/lib/ > libgobject-2.0.so.0.5000.2-gdb.py, ignoring > pkg-static: Unable to access file > /usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/stage/usr/local/>>>>>>> .r441508:No such file > or directory > *** Error code 74 Check the files under /usr/ports/devel/glib20 as it looks like a patch has attempted to be applied and failed. '<<<<<<<', '=======' and '>>>>>>>' are all indications of a diff or patch. Especially check the pkg-plist file. It hasn't changed in SVN in 6 weeks so I don't think it's caused by official source Regards, Gary