From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 18 08:02:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1801E16A4CE for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:02:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lithium.plan-ix.de (lithium.plan-ix.de [212.37.39.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A571E43D2D for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:02:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from braukmann@tse-online.de) Received: from localhost (lithium.plan-ix.de [212.37.39.35]) by lithium.plan-ix.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6E92EC35C; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:02:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.plan-ix.de ([212.37.39.35]) by localhost (lithium.plan-ix.de [212.37.39.35]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id 43459-02; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:02:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.225.210] (p50824DBF.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.130.77.191]) by lithium.plan-ix.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E28562EC35F; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:02:48 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:02:27 +0100 From: Andreas Braukmann To: Mike Jakubik Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <6131.209.2.100.34.1100742491.squirrel@209.2.100.34> References: <200411172357.47735.Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net> <6131.209.2.100.34.1100742491.squirrel@209.2.100.34> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at plan-ix.de cc: Emanuel Strobl cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: serious networking (em) performance (ggate and NFS) problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:02:53 -0000 --On Mittwoch, 17. November 2004 20:48 Uhr -0500 Mike Jakubik wrote: > I have two PCs connected together, using the em card. One is FreeBSD 6 > from Fri Nov 5 , the other is Windows XP. I am using the default mtu of > 1500, no polling, and i get ~ 21MB/s tranfser rates via ftp. Im sure this > would be higher with jumbo frames. probably > Both computers are AMD cpus with Via > chipsets. Which AMD Chipset? VIA did some pretty bad PCI implementations in the past. Once I wondered about suspiciously low transfer rates in the process of testing 3Ware and Adaptec (2120S, 2200S) RAID-Controllers. The transfer rates maxed out at ca. 30 MByte/s. Switching the testboxes mainboard from one with VIA chipset to one with an AMD (MP / MPX) chipset was a great success. -Andreas