From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 4 22:19:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B3E310D for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 22:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2700C2BD for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 22:19:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YeWPm-0001JE-9U for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2015 00:19:45 +0200 Received: from tempe0.bbox.io ([24.249.180.233]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Apr 2015 00:19:42 +0200 Received: from kevin.bowling by tempe0.bbox.io with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Apr 2015 00:19:42 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Kevin Bowling Subject: Re: Will ASAN MFC to 10-STABLE? Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 15:19:34 -0700 Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <486B7716-6548-40D1-9ECE-1A7D997EFFC0@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: tempe0.bbox.io user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 in-reply-to: <486B7716-6548-40D1-9ECE-1A7D997EFFC0@FreeBSD.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 22:19:50 -0000 On 4/4/2015 3:11 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 04 Apr 2015, at 23:30, Kevin Bowling wrote: >> >> I believe the last bits needed to try clang's ASAN feature is the clang-rt stuff. Will this MFC with a clang 3.5 or 3.6 MFC? > > It depends on whether we will ever MFC the most recent version of clang > to stable/10. Since clang 3.5.0 and later require C++11 support, doing > this will make it more difficult to upgrade from 9.x to 10.x, and not > everybody agrees that it is worth the trouble. > > Once 9.x is EOL (expected at the end 2016), it might cease to be an > issue, though. :-) > > -Dimitry Do you know if the clang-rt stuff will function with clang 3.4 or were there changes in the compiler to accommodate FreeBSD? Wondering if we could try and add just the clang-rt libraries since the end of 2016 is a long time away :) Regards, Kevin