From owner-freebsd-current Sat May 11 21:59:49 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA22747 for current-outgoing; Sat, 11 May 1996 21:59:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nervosa.com (root@nervosa.com [192.187.228.86]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA22738 for ; Sat, 11 May 1996 21:59:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from onyx.nervosa.com (coredump@onyx.nervosa.com [10.0.0.1]) by nervosa.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA20186; Sat, 11 May 1996 21:59:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 11 May 1996 21:59:19 -0700 (PDT) From: invalid opcode To: Ollivier Robert cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, "FreeBSD Current Users' list" Subject: Re: The Biff service In-Reply-To: <199604081614.SAA04448@keltia.freenix.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 8 Apr 1996, Ollivier Robert wrote: > It seems that J Wunsch said: > > Would people kill me for introducing a `-b' option to mail.local(8) to > > stop it from attempting to use the ``biff'' service? > > Now I know why I haven't seen any connection attempt from biff... I'm using > procmail as local delivery agent. > I'd would say, go on with the option. It can't hurt anyway. > Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr Why not just use "biff n" ? == Chris Layne ======================================== Nervosa Computing == == coredump@nervosa.com ================ http://www.nervosa.com/~coredump ==