From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 22 17:56:41 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CDD106564A;
	Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:56:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mj@feral.com)
Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD55F8FC12;
	Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:56:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.221.2] (remotevpn [192.168.221.2])
	by ns1.feral.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o3MHud1m025832;
	Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:56:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com)
Message-ID: <4BD08DD4.2090007@feral.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:56:36 -0700
From: Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com>
Organization: Feral Software
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org>
References: <4BD06BD9.6030401@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4BD06BD9.6030401@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender DNS name whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3
	(ns1.feral.com [192.168.221.1]);
	Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Switchover to CAM ATA?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:56:41 -0000

Short opinion from me: Yes, for HEAD. Not MFC'able. It's too major a 
change for that.