From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Jan 26 04:38:54 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA26646
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 04:38:54 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from iclub.nsu.ru (iclub.nsu.ru [193.124.222.66])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA26630
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 04:38:44 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from semen@iclub.nsu.ru)
Received: from localhost (semen@localhost)
	by iclub.nsu.ru (8.9.2/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA05710
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 18:38:10 +0600 (NS)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 18:38:10 +0600 (NS)
From: Ustimenko Semen <semen@iclub.nsu.ru>
To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: What about inclusion of NTFS RO driver into current
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990126162215.2806C-100000@iclub.nsu.ru>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990126183327.5641A-100000@iclub.nsu.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Sorry, for self follow up,

I haven't explain thougth clean enought. 
I've spoken of almost ready NTFS driver, that is reported
to work for near 4-5 people. It was for stable and current
(don't know how to call them now) with little difference.

Thank you


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message