From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 5 14:06:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823A016A4CE; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 14:06:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from postal2.es.net (proxy.es.net [198.128.3.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A9C43D39; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 14:06:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29]) by postal2.es.net (Postal Node 2) with ESMTP (SSL) id IBA74465; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 14:06:27 -0800 Received: from ptavv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id 7F9BE5D07; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 14:06:27 -0800 (PST) To: Tijl Coosemans In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 05 Mar 2004 20:08:35 +0100." <20040305200835.45b89cbc.tijl@ulyssis.org> Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 14:06:27 -0800 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20040305220627.7F9BE5D07@ptavv.es.net> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 06 Mar 2004 04:54:47 -0800 cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: rwatson@freebsd.org cc: jorn@wcborstel.nl cc: rpratt1950@earthlink.net cc: mat@cnd.mcgill.ca Subject: Re: Standard sbc and pcm support in GENERIC kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 22:06:28 -0000 > Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 20:08:35 +0100 > From: Tijl Coosemans > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 17:58:26 +0100 (MET), Helge Oldach wrote: > > > So yes: some machines require a kernel with PNPBIOS even when sound > > modules can be kldload'ed. I presume these are typically boxen without > > knob to disable the PnP BIOS. > > > > Still I wonder whether sound on -CURRENT will do on such a box... > > I have an old toshiba which also needs PNPBIOS in 4-STABLE and > when I tried 5-CURRENT sound just worked. Of course that doesn't say > anything about your setup... That is almost certainly because of ACPI. It handles peripheral devices quite differently from the former mode and, if it works at all on a given system, should eliminate this Plug-n-Play mess when 5 goes STABLE!