From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb 23 21:34:00 2014
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC204FC8;
 Sun, 23 Feb 2014 21:34:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961C117FA;
 Sun, 23 Feb 2014 21:34:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [149.44.171.213] (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.2])
 by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D1CF3F446;
 Sun, 23 Feb 2014 16:33:59 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 22:34:13 +0100 (CET)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: John Marino <marino@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r344737 - head/lang/gcc49
In-Reply-To: <53020DE6.7030201@marino.st>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1402232231420.2233@tuna.site>
References: <201402171319.s1HDJV8R055687@svn.freebsd.org>
 <53020DE6.7030201@marino.st>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 ports-committers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree <svn-ports-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 21:34:00 -0000

On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, John Marino wrote:
>> Log:
>>   Update to the 20140216 snapshot of GCC 4.9.0.  Many bugfixes.
> Now that we resolved that critical license issue with gcc by creating a
> multilicense of GPLv3 and GPLv3RLE, shouldn't all these lang/gcc4X ports
> get that license now?

Yes. :-)  And in the last 6 days I have taken care of all ports.

Thanks for noting this; if I missed anything, let me know.

Gerald

PS: I mostly considered the original bug report critical because a 
port used incorrect license information.  A lack of license information, 
on the other hand, leaves room for improvement, but not so critical.