From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Feb 2 01:36:43 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8794F9778 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 01:36:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DV6qH3SRFz3qDF for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 01:36:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 76B8B4F9D09; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 01:36:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768264F9D08 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 01:36:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DV6qH2t46z3qG6 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 01:36:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5528D25BCF for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 01:36:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1121ahj5093616 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 01:36:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 1121ahlh093615 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 01:36:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 253096] [tcp] RACK does not support TCP MD5 Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 01:36:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: rgrimes@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 01:36:43 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D253096 Rodney W. Grimes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rgrimes@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #5 from Rodney W. Grimes --- (In reply to Michael Tuexen from comment #4) > I think neither RACK nor BBR do support TCP MD5. Up to now, this was also= not intended, I think, but I'll let rrs@ confirm. Do and of the stacks support TCP-AO? I think that should be a requirement since that is the replacement for TCP-MD5. And though TCP-MD5 is officially depricated giving the nature of how slowly TCP-AO has rolled out it would probably be a good idea to have continued support for TCP-MD5 in all stacks (this is not a hard thing to implement) until TCP-AO is more widely deploye= d.=20 Most of my BGP peers have a fall back stance to TCP-MD5 if you can't do TCP= -AO. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=